5 Reasons Why Mugabe Needs an Election More Than Ever

5 Reasons Why Mugabe Needs an Election More Than Ever

Policeman carries NCA banner after crushing a protest. Photo Tawanda Kanhema

Waning legitimacy, poor health, a mangled intra-party succession mechanism and the emergence of a new, credible opposition candidate (The Welshman Factor)… These are the issues Mugabe has to contend with as he ponders ways to secure what would be his ninth term in office. Whichever way, winning is no longer the question.  

Zimbabwean president Robert Gabriel Mugabe (88) has called for the holding of an election in the southern African country before the end of 2012. Mugabe, who has ruled Zimbabwe since its independence from Britain in 1980, has been able to prevail against his opponents, often through the use of force and manipulation of the electoral system over the last three decades.

As he nears the end of his eight term in office with a weakened ruling party, poor health and a stronger, though divided opposition, the Zimbabwean strongman realizes that without an election, there is no clear way of guaranteeing the transition of power within his Zanu PF party nor the security of his private family assets.

While elections are generally seen as a way of reinforcing a government’s legitimacy, there is no indication that Mugabe intends to hand over power to the opposition Movement for Democratic Change, even if it won the election. What seems clear, however, is an effort to re-brand the ruling party while opening avenues for Mugabe to have an honorable exit.

1. Credible and peaceful elections, run in line with internationally acceptable standards, would help Zanu PF consolidate its waning power within and outside Zimbabwe and rebuild its legitimacy with voters as well as the international community. The party shows little capacity to hold credible elections in the short term.

2. Despite a largely negative international and domestic reputation, especially with regards to human rights, a credible election would present Mugabe with an opportunity to renew his image, and possibly to leave office in an honorable way or at least ensure that one of his preferred lieutenants succeeds him.

3. Mugabe has expressed his discontent with the power sharing government, under which he has been forced to accommodate his arch-rival, Morgan Tsvangirai, a trade unionist who undoubtedly holds more sway with voters than Mugabe. An election is the only practical way to dissolve this marriage of convenience.

4. The Welshman Factor: Mugabe prefers to run against a known opponent whose weaknesses are established and easy to exploit. While Mugabe and Tsvangirai have been sparring over executive power,  leader of the MDC-N, political science professor and lead front-runner for the presidency, Welshman Ncube, has been working closely with civil society leaders on credible constitutional reforms.

Ncube is difficult to discredit and in the event of an election, his grassroots efforts to revive Zimbabwe’s broken institutions would place him a head above his competition. With Tsvangirai already having established a numeric majority in the 2008 election, the rise of Welshman would leave Mugabe at a distant third in any election held in 2013. The last thing Mugabe needs is a new, credible contender, and he sees an early election as a way to prevent this from happening.

5. Without an election, a Zanu PF led government is unlikely to survive the international regime of economic sanctions much longer.  Zimbabwe currently uses the U.S. dollar as its official currency, a major blow to any pretenses of national pride.

 

 


  • Anonymous

    N excellent analysis

  • Big Sexy Zimbo

    Mugabe, in my view, wants to die in office because he can’t afford to retire with the power struggles that exist in his party. Only last week, during the his 88 birthday celebrations Mugabe said he was fit as a fiddle and lamented his loss to Tsvangirai in March of 2008 saying his party had imposed candidates.
    He remains cognisant of the fact that most of those party bigwigs are dependent on him that’s why they are supporting him unquestioningly.
    As for Welshman he stands no chance in Zimbabwe, he’s Ndebele and Shonas who make up the majority will not vote for him. Tribalism and regionalism still play a huge part in Zimbabwean politics.

  • http://www.investigativezim.com Tawanda Kanhema

    I dont think that there is much we can do to explain why Zanu PF lost in 2008, with all the control it had over the system. That was a clear show of the MDC’s strength as a party and the effectiveness of its campaigns despite the very difficult political environment in which the elections were held.

    On The Welshman Factor – I am sure you will agree that despite the role of tribalism in politics, candidates do not think of themselves as being strong merely because of their tribal identity. It matters in intra-party power struggles, but once a candidate passes the party test, the next stop is the ballot.

    Candidates think and campaign on the basis of their strength within the party, which is directly related to the strength of their ideas and campaign positions. This belief that a Ndebele cannot win the presidency has not been tested, so it cannot be true. We cannot continue to hold such beliefs and expect to have functioning democracy based on merit.

  • Big Sexy Zimbo

    That would be ideal Mr Kanhema but idealism does not live in Zimbabwe. Welshman has shwon himself to weak, first by appointing Mutambara as leader of his party when he led a breakaway faction in 2005. Secondly he has failed to reign in some of his MPs who have left his party and third he’s even given up on being the third Principal in the tripartite arrangement called the inclusive governmnent.
    He made Mutambara leader because he wanted the nation to believe that he left the bigger MDC on grounds of principle and not Tribe. Even he is worried about tribalism.
    It’s unfortunate that democracy is thought of in a template form that can be carried from one end to the other but democracy is what you make it.

  • http://www.investigativezim.com Tawanda Kanhema

    I left out tribalism because I believe it is us journalists who give it legs. If you think tribal identity is the one thing Zimbabweans care about most, you probably haven’t been watching election outcomes that closely. Identity mattered in the old winner takes all system, which we switched from because Mugabe knew he would not win a majority in 2008. Now he is fighting for second place so that he can still have a chance at the run off, but if he waits another year, there is no guarantee he would even come second at 89 against much younger and more vibrant candidates.

  • Abel

    I think these are textbook excuses sir. you forget that the opposition in Zimbabwe is not capable of taking over power from Mugabe due to their incompetence, they get higher votes simply due to protest against Zanu pf, beyond that, they are clueless on what to do with those votes. 2008 is evidence of this, any leader worth their salt would have taken over power in April 2008 soon after the elections but we were left to watch an opposition that was used to being ‘cheated’ and then spending time crying foul. Now because they were caught unawares by the victory, they got glued to their seats in disbilief, in the meantime Zanu and Mugabe regained their composure, and the rest as they say is history. So please sir, when you make your commentaries, dont overestimate the sorry excuse of an opposition we have in Zimbabwe.

  • Ahmed

    Is it true that Mugabe is on his deathbed?

    • http://www.investigativeafrica.com Investigative Africa

      @Ahmed, there have been rumors to that effect, the actual reporting has been scanty without any sources speaking on the record.

  • http://kanhemaphoto.com Tawanda Kanhema

    Abel, you are right. The opposition could have (ignored the mandated runoff election) and orchestrated a campaign of violence to force Mugabe out of office, and of course that would have led to a protracted, violent power struggle between the two parties, possibly costing thousands of lives. There is very little to suggest that, with its control of the state apparatus, Mugabe’s party would easily have given up power simply because the opposition got more votes.